Skip to content
Categories:

Donor Development

Donor Development Workflow: BPMN Version 2

donordevelopmentbpmnv2

Meeting Chart 1 - as plotted in the community design meeting

Meeting Discussion 1 - as presented in the community design meeting

By admin 9:24 am

4 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Robert van Langh says

    in my experience it has proven that conservation has a real positive impact on donors. therefore ’sell’ the things which you are really good at and be the advocate of that

    July 15, 2009, 2:43 am
  2. jpadfield says

    The work flow looks good. But we could add that results also need to be reported directly to the Donor and the reporting process may need to be repeated, monthly, annually, etc.

    August 7, 2009, 8:56 am
  3. Petria Noble says

    Work flow looks fine though I miss the word conservation in all of this, namely “Conservation Clinics” though maybe Advice could be added: “Conservation Advice/clinics”. In addition to fellowships you can also have endowed positions. The trigger is not always funding; it can also be expertise.

    August 10, 2009, 5:21 am
  4. sfmoma says

    My only comment here has to do with the triggers. It leads me to draft a couple of additional steps to the workflow. Step one: Advocate for the mission and create awareness. Step Two: Sell mission-related plan to Director (and Development). Step Three: Proceed with workflow as outlined. Last step: Evaluate and report results.

    August 10, 2009, 2:43 pm

You must be logged in to post a comment.